Or not.
When I picked an aperture that gave me a bit of depth, I had such a slow enough shutter speed that I ended up with a nice hazy dog.
![]() |
| Not what I was shooting for. |
Yes, I could tweak that in Lightroom, but really not what I was going for...
![]() |
| The tweaked version. Better, obviously, but the whole goal was to get nicely lit photos without massive tweaking. |
And eyeballs.
![]() |
![]() |
| Dramatic eyes, but this would have been much cooler had her nose been more than a blurry blob! |
But not noses AND eyeballs, at least not in the same shot. In case I didn't understand the whole aperture/depth-of-field concept before, I think I've got it now... But I was mystified as to WHY I couldn't get a smaller aperture. In hindsight, I probably shouldn't have fixed my ISO at 200 (I had fixed it because I read something about how you should take your ISO off the 'auto' setting when you are using your flash off-camera; for some reason, I thought I should have a low ISO... Don't ask me now what that reason was...).
But since I didn't really think about changing the ISO at the time, I decided to do something REALLY SCARY. I shot using the full manual setting. Eeeeeh!!! Scary!!! Giving the User absolute control! Nooooo!
*ahem*
With a nice shutter speed (1/200) and a good aperture (f/5.0) and yes, ISO 200 (because I'm a bit slow on the uptake...), I was able to get noses AND eyeballs In The Same Picture!!!
![]() |
| Now THERE'S a pretty girl! |
![]() |
| Look at those eyes! And that snooter! |
![]() |
| More pretty eyes and pretty snooter! |
Day 62/365.











No comments:
Post a Comment